Answers you can trace to a source

Research on who you pay and how you compare, with every finding sourced and every method published.

Engraving of a helmeted diver descending a ladder of ledger rows with a magenta lantern toward the sea floor.
Research goes below the surface.

Good decisions need checkable facts

Finance teams make consequential decisions on thin information. A new distributor is approved because a sales manager vouches for it. A vendor's bank details change and nobody asks who now controls the account. A board approves a finance budget without knowing whether a twelve-day close is quick or slow for an organization of its size. Each of these is a research question, and each has an answer somewhere in public records, filings or your own ledger.

Financial data research finds those answers and writes them down with sources. It covers two kinds of work. Counterparty and vendor due diligence asks who you are dealing with: who owns and controls a company, whether it appears on sanctions lists or in adverse media, and whether its finances support the relationship. Benchmark and sector research asks how you compare on controls maturity, process cost and transparency practice across a defined group.

Both rest on the same discipline. Every finding cites its source and the date it was found. Every method is written down. Conclusions are reviewed by a second person who did not do the research.

What we offer here

Each offering has a fixed scope and a named set of deliverables. Most clients start with one and add others later.

  • Engraving of a horse built from shipping crates before a city gate, a hatch ajar with a magenta latch.

    Sourced research on who owns and controls a counterparty, whether it is sanctioned or in adverse media, and whether its finances support the relationship, written up as a red-flag report.

  • Engraving of a row of graduated weights echoed by a city skyline behind them, one weight in magenta.

    Commissioned research on controls maturity, finance costs and transparency practice across a sector or portfolio, with the full methodology published alongside every report.

The facts are thinner than assumed

  • A key counterparty's ownership is unclear

    A supplier, distributor or acquisition target is held through a holding company or a foreign entity, and nobody can name the people who control it.

  • A vendor changed bank details unexpectedly

    The new account is in a different name or a different country, the request came by email, and the next payment run is on Friday.

  • A board or funder asks how you compare

    Directors want to know whether finance headcount, close timing or controls maturity are normal for an organization like yours, and there is no credible comparison to hand.

  • An association needs sector evidence

    A trade association, funder or lender wants published, defensible data on practice across its members or portfolio, with a method others can scrutinize.

Each finding carries its source

Trace: we start from the decision the research serves, such as approving a distributor or setting a board policy, and agree the question and the standard of evidence it needs.

Test: we gather evidence from public registries, filings, court records, sanctions lists and media, and from your own ledger where it helps, for example by matching a vendor's bank account and address against your employee records. Each finding is corroborated by a second source where one exists.

Disclose: the written report states each finding, its source, its date and how confident we are in it, and keeps fact separate from inference. Benchmark reports carry their full methodology.

Teach: we show your team how to repeat the routine checks, such as sanctions re-screening of new and changed vendors, so the research does not go stale the month after delivery.

Ownership research got harder in 2026

For a short period, US companies filed beneficial ownership information with FinCEN under the Corporate Transparency Act. For domestic companies that ended with FinCEN's interim final rule in March 2025, and a final rule effective 14 August 2026 made the exemption for US companies and US persons permanent. Only foreign entities registered to do business in the United States still report, and they do not report US owners. The filings were never public, so the practical position for a buyer or supplier is unchanged: there is no federal register where you can look up who owns a US company. You have to build the picture yourself. Our article on beneficial ownership after the CTA rollback explains what banks and states still collect.

Most evidence sits in public records

State business registries show formation dates, registered agents and, in some states, managers or officers. SEC EDGAR holds filings from public companies and Form D notices of private offerings. Court dockets show litigation, judgments and bankruptcies. UCC filings show who has lent against a company's assets. For foreign counterparties, registers such as UK Companies House publish the people with significant control.

Sanctions lists from OFAC, the UK and the EU are checked by name and by ownership. Under OFAC's 50 Percent Rule, an entity owned 50 percent or more, directly or indirectly, by one or more blocked persons is itself blocked, even if it appears on no list. A clean name search is therefore not a clean result until the ownership chain has been followed.

Your ledger is a source too

Some of the most useful evidence already sits in your own systems. When we research a vendor we also look at how you pay it: whether its bank account, address or phone number matches an employee's, whether its bank details changed shortly before a large payment, and whether its invoices cluster just below an approval limit. Public records tell you who a company is. Your ledger tells you how the relationship has actually worked. Where the ledger raises more questions than it answers, full-ledger analytics tests every transaction rather than one vendor's.

Benchmarks need a published method

A benchmark is only as good as its sample and its definitions. "Days to close" means nothing unless everyone counts from the same day to the same event. When we run benchmark and sector research for an association, funder, lender or board, the method travels with the report: how participants were chosen, how many responded, how each measure was defined, what was excluded and who paid for the work. Small groups are combined so that no participant can be identified, and if the data cannot support a conclusion, the report says so.

For a first look at your own organization before any formal comparison, the Controls Health Self-Check scores your answers across the five COSO components.

What people ask before hiring us

Do you investigate individuals?

Only in their business roles, such as the owners, directors and officers of a counterparty, and only from public records and commercial databases of public information. We do not research private lives, use pretexting or covert surveillance, or obtain consumer credit reports. If a matter needs a licensed investigator, we will say so.

How is this different from a screening service?

Screening services return possible matches. We interpret them. We resolve false positives, follow ownership chains through holding companies, and connect what we find to the decision in front of you, including what your own ledger shows about the relationship. The output is a written judgment with sources, reviewed by a second person.

Can benchmark research be published under our name?

Yes, if you choose. The methodology is always published with the report, including who commissioned the work and any limits on the data. The commissioner sets the question. The findings are not adjusted to suit it.

Do you use AI in research?

We use software to search, extract and match records, and we may use AI tools to summarize documents inside access-logged environments. Client data is never used to train external AI models, and every finding is reviewed by a person before it appears in a report.

Related work and reading

  • Payment Fraud Defense

    A six-to-eight-week project that redesigns how payment instructions are verified and released, cleans the vendor master, configures bank controls and drills your team against realistic attacks.

  • Supplier Disclosure Readiness

    A reusable, evidenced answer library for the integrity and sustainability questionnaires large customers send, sized to what those customers can actually require.

  • Board & Governance Review

    A three-to-four-week diagnostic of who holds authority, how conflicts and related parties are handled, what the board reads and how its decisions are recorded.

Tell us what you are seeing

A first conversation is a scoping call: what worries you, what you need to show, and to whom. You leave it with a view on where to start, whether or not you hire us.

Writehello@financeethics.com
Call(307) 365-5252
Office7124 Commons Dr, Cheyenne, WY 82009
HoursMonday to Friday, 9:00 to 17:00 Mountain Time